082c5bf099 [refactor] pass coinsview and height to check() (glozow)
ed6115f1ea [mempool] simplify some check() logic (glozow)
9e8d7ad5d9 [validation/mempool] use Spend/AddCoin instead of UpdateCoins (glozow)
09d18916af MOVEONLY: remove single-use helper func CheckInputsAndUpdateCoins (glozow)
e8639ec26a [mempool] remove now-unnecessary code (glozow)
54c6f3c1da [mempool] speed up check() by using coins cache and iterating in topo order (glozow)
30e240f65e [bench] Benchmark CTxMemPool::check() (glozow)
cb1407196f [refactor/bench] make mempool_stress bench reusable and parameterizable (glozow)
Pull request description:
Remove the txmempool <-> validation circular dependency by removing txmempool's dependency on validation. There are two functions in txmempool that need validation right now: `check()` and `removeForReorg()`. This PR removes the dependencies in `check()`.
This PR also improves the performance of `CTxMemPool::check()` by walking through the entries exactly once, in ascending ancestorcount order, which guarantees that we see parents before children.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK 082c5bf099
GeneFerneau:
tACK [082c5bf](082c5bf099)
rajarshimaitra:
tACK 082c5bf099
theStack:
Code-review ACK 082c5bf099
Tree-SHA512: 40ac622af1627b5c3e6abb4f0f035d833265a8c5e8dc88faf5354875dfb5137f137825e54bbd2a2668ed37b145c5d02285f776402629f58596e51853a9a79d29
a0efe529e4 Fix outdated comments referring to ::ChainActive() (Samuel Dobson)
Pull request description:
After #21866 there are a few outdated comments referring to `::ChainActive()`, which should instead refer to `ChainstateManager::ActiveChain()`.
ACKs for top commit:
jamesob:
ACK a0efe529e4
Tree-SHA512: 80da19c105ed29ac247e6df4c8e916c3bf3f37230b63f07302114eef9c115add673e9649f0bbe237295be0c6da7b1030b5b93e14daf6768f17ce5de7cf2c9ff2
The tracepoint `validation:block_connected` was introduced in #22006.
The first argument was the hash of the connected block as a pointer
to a C-like String. The last argument passed the hash of the
connected block as a pointer to 32 bytes. The hash was only passed as
string to allow `bpftrace` scripts to print the hash. It was
(incorrectly) assumed that `bpftrace` cannot hex-format and print the
block hash given only the hash as bytes.
The block hash can be printed in `bpftrace` by calling
`printf("%02x")` for each byte of the hash in an `unroll () {...}`.
By starting from the last byte of the hash, it can be printed in
big-endian (the block-explorer format).
```C
$p = $hash + 31;
unroll(32) {
$b = *(uint8*)$p;
printf("%02x", $b);
$p -= 1;
}
```
See also: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/22902#discussion_r705176691
This is a breaking change to the block_connected tracepoint API, however
this tracepoint has not yet been included in a release.
3b613722f6 Add release notes for fee est with replacement txs (Antoine Poinsot)
4556406562 qa: test fee estimation with replacement transactions (Antoine Poinsot)
053415b297 qa: split run_test into smaller parts (Antoine Poinsot)
06c5ce9714 Re-include RBF replacement txs in fee estimation (Antoine Poinsot)
Pull request description:
This effectively reverts #9519.
RBF is now largely in use on the network (signaled for by around 20% of
all transactions on average) and replacement logic is implemented in
most end-user wallets. The rate of replaced transactions is also
expected to rise as fee-bumping techniques are being developed for
pre-signed transaction ("L2") protocols.
ACKs for top commit:
prayank23:
reACK 3b613722f6
Zero-1729:
re-ACK 3b613722f6
benthecarman:
reACK 3b613722f6
glozow:
ACK 3b613722f6
theStack:
re-ACK 3b613722f6🍪
Tree-SHA512: a6146d15c80ff4ba9249314b0ef953a66a15673e61b8f98979642814f1b169b5695e330e3ee069fa9a7e4d1f8aa10e1dcb7f9aa79181cea5a4c4dbcaf5483023
UpdateCoins is an unnecessary dependency on validation. All we need to
do is add and remove coins to check inputs. We don't need the extra
logic for checking coinbases and handling TxUndos.
Also remove the wrapper function in validation.h which constructs a
throwaway TxUndo object before calling UpdateCoins because it is now
unused.
This effectively reverts de1ae324bf.
RBF is now largely in use on the network (signaled for by around 20% of
all transactions on average) and replacement logic is implemented in
most end-user wallets. The rate of replaced transactions is also
expected to rise as fee-bumping techniques are being developed for
pre-signed transaction ("L2") protocols.
Signed-off-by: Antoine Poinsot <darosior@protonmail.com>
Improve readability of code, simplify future scripted diff cleanup PRs, and be
more consistent with naming for GetBoolArg.
This will also be useful for replacing runtime settings type checking
with compile time checking.
-BEGIN VERIFY SCRIPT-
git grep -l GetArg | xargs sed -i 's/GetArg(\([^)]*\( [0-9]\+\|-1\|port\|BaseParams().RPCPort()\|Params().GetDefaultPort()\|_TIMEOUT\|Height\|_WORKQUEUE\|_THREADS\|_CONNECTIONS\|LIMIT\|SigOp\|Bytes\|_VERSION\|_AGE\|_CHECKS\|Checks() ? 1 : 0\|_BANTIME\|Cache\|BLOCKS\|LEVEL\|Weight\|Version\|BUFFER\|TARGET\|WEIGHT\|TXN\|TRANSACTIONS\|ADJUSTMENT\|i64\|Size\|nDefault\|_EXPIRY\|HEIGHT\|SIZE\|SNDHWM\|_TIME_MS\)\))/GetIntArg(\1)/g'
-END VERIFY SCRIPT-
Co-authored-by: Hennadii Stepanov <32963518+hebasto@users.noreply.github.com>
faa9c19a4b doc: Add 23061 release notes (MarcoFalke)
faff17bbde Fix (inverse) meaning of -persistmempool (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
Passing `-persistmempool` is currently treated as `-nopersistmempool`
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
reACK faa9c19a4b
hebasto:
ACK faa9c19a4b, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: f34a89a07745dabe340eb845b2a348b79c093e9056f7a21c17e1ba2e278177c9b4cf30e8095791fd645a7f90eb34850b2eee0c869b4f6ec02bf749c73b0e52ee
673a5bd337 test: validation: add unittest for UpdateTip behavior (James O'Beirne)
2705570109 test: refactor: separate CreateBlock in TestChain100Setup (James O'Beirne)
298bf5d563 test: refactor: declare NoMalleation const auto (James O'Beirne)
071200993f move-only: unittest: add test/util/chainstate.h (James O'Beirne)
8f5710fd0a validation: fix CheckBlockIndex for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
5a807736da validation: insert assumed-valid block index entries into candidates (James O'Beirne)
01a9b8fe71 validation: set BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID during snapshot load (James O'Beirne)
42b2520db9 chain: add BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID for use with assumeutxo (James O'Beirne)
b217020df7 validation: change UpdateTip for multiple chainstates (James O'Beirne)
665072a36d doc: add comment for g_best_block (James O'Beirne)
ac4051d891 refactor: remove unused assumeutxo methods (James O'Beirne)
9f6bb53935 validation: add chainman ref to CChainState (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: #15606)
---
Modify UpdateTip and CheckBlockIndex for use with multiple chainstates. Includes a new unittest verifying `g_best_block` behavior (previously untested at the unit level) and various changes necessary for running and testing `ProcessNewBlock()`-like behavior on the background validation chainstate.
This changeset introduces a new block index `nStatus` flag called `BLOCK_ASSUMED_VALID`, and it is applied to block index entries that are beneath the UTXO snapshot base block upon snapshot load. Once each block is validated (during async background validation), the flag is removed. This allows us to avoid (ab)using `BLOCK_VALID_*` flags for snapshot chain block entries, and preserves the original meaning of those flags.
Note: this PR previously incorporated changes to `LoadBlockIndex()` and `RewindBlockIndex()` as noted in Russ' comments below, but once I generated the changes necessary to test the UpdateTip change, I decided to split this changes out into another PR due to the size of this one.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 673a5bd337
jonatack:
Code-review re-ACK 673a5bd337 reviewed diff, rebased to master/debug build/ran unit+functional tests
naumenkogs:
ACK 673a5bd337
fjahr:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337
ariard:
utACK 673a5bd3
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 673a5bd337. Just linker fix and split commit changes mentioned https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21526#issuecomment-921064563 since last review
benthecarman:
ACK 673a5bd337
Tree-SHA512: 0a6dc23d041b27ed9fd0ee1f3e5971b92fb1d2df2fc9b655d5dc48594235321ab1798d06de2ec55482ac3966a9ed56de8d56e9e29cae75bbe8690bafc2dda383
ab27800799 log: Remove unnecessary timing logs for Callbacks bench (Douglas Chimento)
Pull request description:
Logging of Callbacks are no longer needed and records times that are not relevant for performance analysis.
resolves#23071
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Thanks. re-ACK ab27800799
jonatack:
Code review ACK ab27800799
Tree-SHA512: be1ea780c4db9407a8799065a8824b9d3610abac72af5907809ed62d493d5a54e65735de45ec5fdd0edb85ef21ec6036105abe8ca00093942980f6f92e7fec50
0ef08f8bed add missing includes in policy/rbf (glozow)
c6abeb76fb make MAX_BIP125_RBF_SEQUENCE constexpr (glozow)
3cf46f6055 [doc] improve RBF documentation (glozow)
c78eb8651b [policy/refactor] pass in relay fee instead of using global (glozow)
Pull request description:
Followups to #22675 and documentation-only changes intended to clarify the code/logic concerning mempool Replace-by-Fee.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
utACK 0ef08f8bed
fanquake:
ACK 0ef08f8bed
Tree-SHA512: 6797ae758beca0c9673cb00ce85da48e9a4ac5cb5100074ca93e004cdb31d24d91a1a7721b57fc2f619addfeb4950d8caf45fee0f5b7528defbbd121eb4d271f
fa20f815a9 Remove txindex migration code (MarcoFalke)
fae8786033 doc: Fix validation typo (MarcoFalke)
fab89006d6 Add missing includes and forward declarations, remove unused ones (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
No supported version of Bitcoin Core used the legacy txindex, so all relevant nodes can be assumed to have upgraded. Thus, there is no need to keep this code any longer.
As a temporary courtesy, provide a one-time warning on how to free the disk space used by the legacy txindex.
Fixes#22615
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK fa20f815a9
hebasto:
ACK fa20f815a9, tested on Linux Mint 20.2 (x86_64).
Zero-1729:
crACK fa20f815a9
theStack:
Approach ACK fa20f815a9
Tree-SHA512: 68aa32d064d1e3932e6e382816a4b5de417bd7e82861fea1ee50660e8c397f4efeb88ae4ed54a8ad1952c3563eb0b8449d7ccf883c353cc4d4dc7e15c53d78e8
Adjust CheckBlockIndex to account for
- assumed-valid block indexes lacking transaction data, and
- setBlockIndexCandidates for the background chainstate not containing certain entries
which rely on assumed-valid ancestors.
Mark the block index entries that are beneath the snapshot base block as
assumed-valid. Subsequent commits will make use of this flag in other
parts of the system.
Only perform certain behavior (namely that related to servicing
the getblocktemplate RPC call) for the active chainstate when
calling UpdateTip.
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <jon@atack.com>
32748da0f4 whitespace fixups after move and scripted-diff (glozow)
fa47622e8d scripted-diff: rename variables in policy/rbf (glozow)
ac761f0a23 MOVEONLY: fee checks (Rules 3 and 4) to policy/rbf (glozow)
9c2f9f8984 MOVEONLY: check that fees > direct conflicts to policy/rbf (glozow)
3f033f01a6 MOVEONLY: check for disjoint conflicts and ancestors to policy/rbf (glozow)
7b60c02b7d MOVEONLY: BIP125 Rule 2 to policy/rbf (glozow)
f8ad2a57c6 Make GetEntriesForConflicts return std::optional (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR does not change behavior. It extracts the BIP125 logic into helper functions (and puts them in the policy/rbf* files). This enables three things - I think each one individually is pretty good:
- Implementation of package RBF (see #22290). I want it to be as close to BIP125 as possible so that it doesn't become a distinct fee-bumping mechanism. Doing these move-only commits first means the diff is mostly mechanical to review, and I just need to create a function that mirrors the single transaction validation.
- We will be able to isolate and test our RBF logic alone. Recently, there have been some discussions on discrepancies between our code and BIP125, as well as proposals for improving it. Generally, I think making this code more modular and de-bloating validation.cpp is probably a good idea.
- Witness Replacement (replacing same-txid-different-wtxid when the witness is significantly smaller and therefore higher feerate) in a BIP125-similar way. Hopefully it can just be implemented with calls to the rbf functions (i.e. `PaysForRBF`) and an edit to the relevant mempool entries.
ACKs for top commit:
mjdietzx:
ACK 32748da0f4
theStack:
Code-review ACK 32748da0f4📐
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 32748da0f4🦇
Tree-SHA512: d89985c8b4b42b54861018deb89468e04968c85a3fb1113bbcb2eb2609577bc4fd9bf254593b5bd0e7ab059a0fa8192d1a903b00f77e6f120c7a80488ffcbfc0
f293c68be0 MOVEONLY: getting mempool conflicts to policy/rbf (glozow)
8d71796335 [validation] quit RBF logic earlier and separate loops (glozow)
badb9b11a6 call SignalsOptInRBF instead of checking all inputs (glozow)
e0df41d7d5 [validation] default conflicting fees and size to 0 (glozow)
b001b9f6de MOVEONLY: BIP125 max conflicts limit to policy/rbf.h (glozow)
Pull request description:
See #22675 for motivation, this is one chunk of it. It extracts some BIP125 logic into policy/rbf:
- Defines a constant for specifying the maximum number of mempool entries we'd consider replacing by RBF
- Calls the available `SignalsOptInRBF` function instead of manually iterating through inputs
- Moves the logic for getting the list of conflicting mempool entries to a helper function
- Also does a bit of preparation for future moves - moving declarations around, etc
Also see #22677 for addressing the circular dependency.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f293c68be0
theStack:
Code-review ACK f293c68be0📔
ariard:
ACK f293c68b
Tree-SHA512: a60370994569cfc91d4b2ad5e94542d4855a48927ae8b174880216074e4fa50d4523dd4ee36efdd6edf2bf7adb87a8beff9c3aaaf6dd323b286b287233e63790
The RecursiveMutex cs_nBlockSequenceId is only used at one place in
CChainState::ReceivedBlockTransactions() to atomically read-and-increment the
nBlockSequenceId member. At this point, the cs_main lock is set, hence we can
use a plain int for the member and mark it as guarded by cs_main.
No behavior change.
While we're looking through the descendants and calculating how many
transactions we might replace, quit early, as soon as we hit 100.
Since we're failing faster, we can also separate the loops - yes, we
loop through more times, but this helps us detangle the different BIP125
rules later.
A circular dependency is added because policy now depends on txmempool and
txmempool depends on validation. It is natural for [mempool] policy to
rely on mempool; the problem is caused by txmempool depending on
validation. #22677 will resolve this.
f685a13bef doc: GetTransaction()/getrawtransaction follow-ups to #22383 (John Newbery)
abc57e1f08 refactor: move `GetTransaction(...)` to node/transaction.cpp (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
~This PR is based on #22383, which should be reviewed first~ (merged by now).
In [yesterday's PR review club session to PR 22383](https://bitcoincore.reviews/22383), the idea of moving the function `GetTransaction(...)` from src/validation.cpp to src/node/transaction.cpp came up. With this, the circular dependency "index/txindex -> validation -> index/txindex" is removed (see change in `lint-circular-dependencies.sh`). Thanks to jnewbery for suggesting and to sipa for providing historical background.
Relevant IRC log:
```
17:52 <jnewbery> Was anyone surprised that GetTransaction() is in validation.cpp? It seems to me that node/transaction.cpp would be a more appropriate place for it.
17:53 <raj_> jnewbery, +1
17:53 <stickies-v> agreed!
17:54 <glozow> jnewbery ya
17:54 <jnewbery> seems weird that validation would call into txindex. I wonder if we remove this function, then validation would no longer need to #include txindex
17:54 <sipa> GetTransaction predates node/transaction.cpp, and even the generic index framework itself :)
17:55 <sipa> (before 0.8, validation itself used the txindex)
17:55 <jnewbery> (and GetTransaction() seems like a natural sibling to BroadcastTransaction(), which is already in node/transaction.cpp)
17:55 <jnewbery> sipa: right, this is not meant as a criticism of course. Just wondering if we can organize things a bit more rationally now that we have better separation between things.
17:55 <sipa> jnewbery: sure, just providing background
17:56 <sipa> seems very reasonable to move it elsewhere now
```
The commit should be trivial to review with `--color-moved`.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
Code review ACK f685a13bef
rajarshimaitra:
tACK f685a13bef
mjdietzx:
crACK f685a13bef
LarryRuane:
Code review, test ACK f685a13bef
Tree-SHA512: 0e844a6ecb1be04c638b55bc4478c2949549a4fcae01c984eee078de74d176fb19d508fc09360a62ad130677bfa7daf703b67870800e55942838d7313246248c
78f4c8b98e prefer to use txindex if available for GetTransaction (Jameson Lopp)
Pull request description:
Fixes#22382
Motivation: prevent excessive disk reads if txindex is enabled.
Worth noting that this could be argued to be less of a bug and more of an issue of undefined behavior. If a user calls GetTransaction with the wrong block hash, what should happen?
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 78f4c8b98e
theStack:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
LarryRuane:
tACK 78f4c8b98e
luke-jr:
utACK 78f4c8b98e
jnewbery:
utACK 78f4c8b98e
rajarshimaitra:
Code review ACK 78f4c8b98e
lsilva01:
Code Review ACK and Tested ACK 78f4c8b98e on Ubuntu 20.04
Tree-SHA512: af7db5b98cb2ae4897b28476b2fa243bf7e6f850750d9347062fe8013c5720986d1a3c808f80098e5289bd84b085de03c81a44e584dc28982f721c223651bfe0
a806647d26 [validation] Always include merkle root in coinbase commitment (Dhruv Mehta)
189128c220 [validation] Set witness script flag with p2sh for blocks (Dhruv Mehta)
ac82b99db7 [p2p] remove redundant NODE_WITNESS checks (Dhruv Mehta)
6f8b198b82 [p2p] remove unused segwitheight=-1 option (Dhruv Mehta)
eba5b1cd64 [test] remove or move tests using `-segwitheight=-1` (Dhruv Mehta)
Pull request description:
Builds on #21009 and makes progress on remaining items in #17862
Removing `RewindBlockIndex()` in #21009 allows the following:
- removal of tests using `segwitheight=-1` in `p2p_segwit.py`.
- move `test_upgrade_after_activation()` out of `p2p_segwit.py` reducing runtime
- in turn, that allows us to drop support for `-segwitheight=-1`, which is only supported for that test.
- that allows us to always set `NODE_WITNESS` in our local services. The only reason we don't do that is to support `-segwitheight=-1`.
- that in turn allows us to drop all of the `GetLocalServices() & NODE_WITNESS` checks inside `net_processing.cpp`, since our local services would always include `NODE_WITNESS`
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
Code-Review ACK a806647d26
laanwj:
Code review ACK a806647d26, nice cleanup
jnewbery:
utACK a806647d26
theStack:
ACK a806647d26
Tree-SHA512: 73e1a69d1d7eca1f5c38558ec6672decd0b60b16c2ef6134df6f6af71bb159e6eea160f9bb5ab0eb6723c6632d29509811e29469d0d87abbe9b69a2890fbc73e
After feedback from Russ, I realized that there are some extraneous assumeutxo methods
that are not necessary and probably just overly confusing. These include
- `Validated*()`
- `IsBackgroundIBD()`
and they can be removed.
Add an upwards reference to chainstate instances to the owning
ChainstateManager. This is necessary because there are a number
of `this_chainstate == chainman.ActiveChainstate()` checks that
will happen (as a result of assumeutxo) in functions that otherwise
don't have an easily-accessible reference to the chainstate's
ChainManager.
ceb7b35a39 refactor: move UpdateTip into CChainState (James O'Beirne)
4abf0779d6 refactor: no mempool arg to GetCoinsCacheSizeState (James O'Beirne)
46e3efd1e4 refactor: move UpdateMempoolForReorg into CChainState (James O'Beirne)
617661703a validation: make CChainState::m_mempool optional (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Make `CChainState::m_mempool` optional by making it a pointer instead of a reference. This will allow a simplification to assumeutxo semantics (see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905) and help facilitate the `-nomempool` option.
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK ceb7b35a39
naumenkogs:
ACK ceb7b35a39
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK ceb7b35a39 (just minor style and test tweaks since last review)
lsilva01:
Code review ACK and tested on Signet ACK ceb7b35a39
MarcoFalke:
review ACK ceb7b35a39😌
Tree-SHA512: cc445ad33439d5918cacf80a6354eea8f3d33bb7719573ed5b970fad1a0dab410bcd70be44c862b8aba1b71263b82d79876688c553e339362653dfb3d8ec81e6
Since we now have multiple chainstate objects, only one of them is active at any given
time. An active chainstate has a mempool, but there's no point to others having one.
This change will simplify proposed assumeutxo semantics. See the discussion here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606#pullrequestreview-692965905
Co-authored-by: Russell Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
Adds support for versionbits deployments to DeploymentEnabled,
DeploymentActiveAfter and DeploymentActiveAt. Also moves versionbitscache
from validation to deploymentstatus.
Provides DeploymentEnabled, DeploymentActiveAt, and DeploymentActiveAfter
helpers for checking the status of buried deployments. Can be overloaded
so the same syntax works for non-buried deployments, allowing future
soft forks to be changed from signalled to buried deployments without
having to touch the implementation code.
Replaces IsWitnessEnabled and IsScriptWitnessEnabled.
fa0d9211ef refactor: Remove chainparams arg from CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
fa38947125 refactor: Remove ::Params() global from inside CChainState member functions (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
The `::Params()` global is verbose and confusing. Also it makes tests a bit harder to write because they'd have to mock a global.
Fix all issues by simply using a member variable that points to the right params.
(Can be reviewed with `--word-diff-regex=.`)
ACKs for top commit:
jnewbery:
ACK fa0d9211ef
kiminuo:
utACK fa0d9211
theStack:
ACK fa0d9211ef🍉
Tree-SHA512: 44676b19c9ed471ccb536331d3029bad192d7d50f394fd7b8527ec431452aeec8c4494164b9cf8e16e0123c4463b16be864366c6b599370032c17262625a0356
fa9ebedec3 Reject invalid coin height and output index when loading assumeutxo (MarcoFalke)
Pull request description:
It should be impossible to have a coin at a height higher than the height of the snapshot block, so reject those early to avoid integer wraparounds and hash collisions later on.
Same for the outpoint index.
Both issues were found by fuzzing:
* The height issue by OSS-Fuzz: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793
* The outpoint issue by my fuzz server: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=34793#c2
ACKs for top commit:
practicalswift:
cr ACK fa9ebedec3: patch looks correct
jamesob:
crACK fa9ebedec3
theStack:
Code review ACK fa9ebedec3
benthecarman:
crACK fa9ebedec3
Tree-SHA512: dae7caee4b3862b23ebdf2acb7edec4baf75b0dbf1409b370b1a73aa6b632b317ebfac596dcbaf4edfb1301b513f45465ea75328962460f35e2af0d7e547c9ac
2eb0eeda39 validation: document lack of inherited signaling in RBF policy (Antoine Riard)
906b6d9da6 test: Extend feature_rbf.py with no inherited signaling (Antoine Riard)
Pull request description:
Contrary to BIP125 or other full-node implementation (e.g btcd), Bitcoin Core's mempool policy doesn't implement inherited signaling.
This PR documents our mempool behavior on this and add a test demonstrating the case.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK 2eb0eeda39
benthecarman:
ACK 2eb0eeda39
Tree-SHA512: d41453d3b49bae3c1eb532a968f43bc047084913bd285929d4d9cba142777ff2be38163d912e28dfc635f4ecf446de68effad799c6e71be52f81e83410c712fb
* Rename RewindBlockIndex -> NeedsRedownload (follow-up to commit
d831e711ca)
* Fix typos
* Inline comments about faking chain data to avoid duplicating them
13650fe2e5 [policy] detect unsorted packages (glozow)
9ef643e21b [doc] add release note for package testmempoolaccept (glozow)
c4259f4b7e [test] functional test for packages in RPCs (glozow)
9ede34a6f2 [rpc] allow multiple txns in testmempoolaccept (glozow)
ae8e6df709 [policy] limit package sizes (glozow)
c9e1a26d1f [fuzz] add ProcessNewPackage call in tx_pool fuzzer (glozow)
363e3d916c [test] unit tests for ProcessNewPackage (glozow)
cd9a11ac96 [test] make submit optional in CreateValidMempoolTransaction (glozow)
2ef187941d [validation] package validation for test accepts (glozow)
578148ded6 [validation] explicit Success/Failure ctors for MempoolAcceptResult (glozow)
b88d77aec5 [policy] Define packages (glozow)
249f43f3cc [refactor] add option to disable RBF (glozow)
897e348f59 [coins/mempool] extend CCoinsViewMemPool to track temporary coins (glozow)
42cf8b25df [validation] make CheckSequenceLocks context-free (glozow)
Pull request description:
This PR enables validation dry-runs of packages through the `testmempoolaccept` RPC. The expectation is that the results returned from `testmempoolaccept` are what you'd get from test-then-submitting each transaction individually, in that order (this means the package is expected to be sorted in topological order, for now at least). The validation is also atomic: in the case of failure, it immediately halts and may return "unfinished" `MempoolAcceptResult`s for transactions that weren't fully validated. The API for 1 transaction stays the same.
**Motivation:**
- This allows you to test validity for transaction chains (e.g. with multiple spending paths and where you don't want to broadcast yet); closes#18480.
- It's also a first step towards package validation in a minimally invasive way.
- The RPC commit happens to close#21074 by clarifying the "allowed" key.
There are a few added restrictions on the packages, mostly to simplify the logic for areas that aren't critical to main package use cases:
- No package can have conflicts, i.e. none of them can spend the same inputs, even if it would be a valid BIP125 replacement.
- The package cannot conflict with the mempool, i.e. RBF is disabled.
- The total count of the package cannot exceed 25 (the default descendant count limit), and total size cannot exceed 101KvB (the default descendant size limit).
If you're looking for review comments and github isn't loading them, I have a gist compiling some topics of discussion [here](https://gist.github.com/glozow/c3acaf161c95bba491fce31585b2aaf7)
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review re-ACK 13650fe2e5
jnewbery:
Code review ACK 13650fe2e5
ariard:
ACK 13650fe
Tree-SHA512: 8c5cbfa91a6c714e1c8710bb281d5ff1c5af36741872a7c5df6b24874d6272b4a09f816cb8a4c7de33ef8e1c2a2c252c0df5105b7802f70bc6ff821ed7cc1a2f
Maximum number of transactions allowed in a package is 25, equal to the
default mempool descendant limit: if a package has more transactions
than this, either it would fail default mempool descendant limit or the
transactions don't all have a dependency relationship (but then they
shouldn't be in a package together). Same rationale for 101KvB virtual
size package limit.
Note that these policies are only used in test accepts so far.
Only allow test accepts for now. Use the CoinsViewTemporary to keep
track of coins created by each transaction so that subsequent
transactions can spend them. Uncache all coins since we only
ever do test accepts (Note this is different from ATMP which doesn't
uncache for valid test_accepts) to minimize impact on the coins cache.
Require that the input txns have no conflicts and be ordered
topologically. This commit isn't able to detect unsorted packages.
Allow CheckSequenceLocks to use heights and coins from any CoinsView and
CBlockIndex provided. This means that CheckSequenceLocks() doesn't need
to hold the mempool lock or cs_main. The caller is responsible for
ensuring the CoinsView and CBlockIndex are consistent before passing
them in. The typical usage is still to create a CCoinsViewMemPool from
the mempool and grab the CBlockIndex from the chainstate tip.
