dddd1acf58 net: Set relay in version msg to peers with relay permission (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to set the `relay` permission in -blocksonly mode and also ask the peer not to relay transactions.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK dddd1acf58
naumenkogs:
ACK dddd1acf58
mzumsande:
ACK dddd1acf58
Tree-SHA512: 7bb0e964993ea4982747ae2801fe963ff88586e2ded03015b60ab83172b5b61f2d50e9cde9d7711b7ab207f8639467ecafc4d011ea151ec6c82c722f510f4df7
deba6fe315 test: update feature_config_args.py (josibake)
2e3826cbcd util: warn if reindex is used in conf (josibake)
5e744f4238 util: disallow setting conf in bitcoin.conf (josibake)
Pull request description:
In help from `bitcoind -h` it specifes that `conf` can only be used from the commandline. However, if `conf` is set in a `bitcoin.conf` file, there is no error and from reading the logs it seems as if the `conf=<other file>` is being used, despite it being ignored. To recreate, you can setup a `bitcoin.conf` file in the default directory, add `conf=<some other file>.conf` and in the separate config file set whichever config value you want and verify that it is being ignored. alternatively, if you set `includeconf=<some other file>.conf` , your config in `<some other file>` will be picked up.
This PR fixes this by having the node error when reading the config file if `conf=` is set.
Additionally, it was mentioned in a recent [PR review club](https://bitcoincore.reviews/24858) that if `reindex=1` is set in the config file, the node will reindex on every startup, which is undesirable:
```irc
17:14 <larryruane> michaelfolkson: Reindex is requested by the user (node operator) as a configuration option (command line or in the config file, tho you probably would never put it in the file, or else it would reindex on every startup!)
```
This PR also has a commit to warn if `reindex=1` is set in the config file.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK deba6fe315, tested on Ubuntu 22.04.
aureleoules:
tACK deba6fe315
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK deba6fe315.
Tree-SHA512: 619fd0aa14e98af1166d6beb92651f5ba3f10d38b8ee132957f094f19c3a37313d9f4d7be2e4019f3fc9a2ca5fa42d03eb539ad820e27efec7ee58a26eb520b1
315fd4dbab test: Test for out of bounds vout in sendall (Andrew Chow)
b132c85650 wallet: Check utxo prevout index out of bounds in sendall (Andrew Chow)
708b72b715 test: Test that sendall works with watchonly spending specific utxos (Andrew Chow)
6bcd7e2a3b wallet: Correctly check ismine for sendall (Andrew Chow)
Pull request description:
The `sendall` RPC would previously fail when used with a watchonly wallet and specified inputs. This failure was caused by checking isminetype equality with ISMINE_ALL rather than a bitwise AND as IsMine can never return ISMINE_ALL.
Also added a test.
ACKs for top commit:
w0xlt:
ACK 315fd4dbab
furszy:
ACK 315fd4db
Tree-SHA512: fb55cf6524e789964770b803f401027319f0351433ea084ffa7c5e6f1797567a608c956b7f7c5bd542aa172c4b7b38b07d0976f5ec587569efead27266e8664c
3e9d0bea8d build: only run high priority benchmarks in 'make check' (furszy)
466b54bd4a bench: surround main() execution with try/catch (furszy)
3da7cd2a76 bench: explicitly make all current benchmarks "high" priority (furszy)
05b8c76232 bench: add "priority level" to the benchmark framework (furszy)
f1593780b8 bench: place benchmark implementation inside benchmark namespace (furszy)
Pull request description:
This is from today's meeting, a simple "priority level" for the benchmark framework.
Will allow us to run certain benchmarks while skip non-prioritized ones in `make check`.
By default, `bench_bitcoin` will run all the benchmarks. `make check`will only run the high priority ones,
and have marked all the existent benchmarks as "high priority" to retain the current behavior.
Could test it by modifying any benchmark priority to something different from "high", and
run `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=high` and/or `bench_bitcoin -priority-level=medium,low`
(the first command will skip the modified bench while the second one will include it).
Note: the second commit could be avoided by having a default arg value for the priority
level but.. an explicit set in every `BENCHMARK` macro call makes it less error-prone.
ACKs for top commit:
kouloumos:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
achow101:
ACK 3e9d0bea8d
theStack:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
stickies-v:
re-ACK 3e9d0bea8d
Tree-SHA512: ece59bf424c5fc1db335f84caa507476fb8ad8c6151880f1f8289562e17023aae5b5e7de03e8cbba6337bf09215f9be331e9ef51c791c43bce43f7446813b054
e133264c5b Add test for PSBT input verification (Greg Sanders)
d25699280a Verify PSBT inputs rather than check for fields being empty (Greg Sanders)
Pull request description:
In a few keys spots, PSBT finality is checked by looking for non-empty witness data.
This complicates a couple things:
1) Empty data can be valid in certain cases
2) User may be passed bogus final data by a counterparty during PSBT work happening, and end up with incorrect signatures that they may not be able to check in other contexts if the UTXO doesn't exist yet in chain/mempool, timelocks, etc.
On the whole I think these heavier checks are worth it in case someone is actually assuming the signatures are correct if our API is saying so.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK e133264c5b
Tree-SHA512: 9de4fbb0be1257b081781f5df908fd55666e3acd5c4e36beb3b3f2f5a6aed69ff77068c44cde6127e159e773293fd9ced4c0bb47e693969f337e74dc8af030da
5d3f98d278 refactor: Replace m_params with chainman.GetParams() (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Fixes a TODO introduced in #24595.
Removes `m_params` from `CChainState` class and replaces it with `m_chainman.GetParams()`.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 5d3f98d278🌎
Tree-SHA512: de0fe31450d281cc7307c0d820495e86c93c7998e77a148db2c703da66cff1059e6560c041f1864913c42075aa24d259c2623d45e929ca0a8056ed330a9f9978
1c48dae76f test: Use C++11 member initializers for TestMemPoolEntryHelper (MacroFake)
fad7f2239c test: Remove unused txmempool include from tests (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Seems odd to include this heavy header in all tests despite it only being used in a few tests.
Can be reviewed with `--color-moved=dimmed-zebra --ignore-all-space`
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
reACK 1c48dae76f
hebasto:
ACK 1c48dae76f, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
w0xlt:
ACK 1c48dae76f
Tree-SHA512: 31f2808d04ec33bfc2409832b8e59e6c870eaa98fbcf879e1c786492c7d07134711b30f8290bdb34e1b8f7b8f2f11dae8e10c64e7eb31f584b2f5c58fcc7743b
b147322a7a Use `PACKAGE_NAME` in messages rather than hardcoding "Bitcoin Core" (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Usually, we do not hardcode "Bitcoin Core" in the user-faced messages.
See:
- bitcoin/bitcoin#18646
- bitcoin/bitcoin#19282
Also grammar has been improved -- singular instead of plural.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK b147322a7a
Tree-SHA512: b135c18703dfdd7b63d4cb27d1ac48f6a9dbf69382142ae381f33bf561cbf57477a11d1c73263aa834f705206d7dd5716df2523d38ed0d4cfec8babc38bb017a
This changes the flag for the bitcoin-chainstate executable. Previously
it was false, now it is the chain's default value (still false for the
main chain).
This changes the minimum chain work for the bitcoin-chainstate
executable. Previously it was uint256{}, now it is the chain's default
minimum chain work.
af781bf4b2 doc: fix typo in doc/libraries.md (fanquake)
9e9ae6101f doc: remove library commentary from src/Makefile.am (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Deduplicate the makefile comments, in favour of doc/libraries.md. I think a single, more comprehensive source of truth is preferable. Diagrams are also useful. Came up in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26292#issuecomment-1275094478.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK af781bf4b2, nice cleanups
hebasto:
ACK af781bf4b2, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: df61ed1394102221701ae2dfa42886dfabe9d9fd7f601b794e2195f93d8f7c2a1cd1c000a77d0a969b42328e8ebc0387755c57291837b283fdf376dbd98fdda1
We optimistically pre-register a peer for txreconciliations
upon sending txreconciliation support announcement.
But if, at VERACK, we realize that the peer never sent
WTXIDRELAY message, we should unregister the peer
from txreconciliations, because txreconciliations rely on wtxids.
Once we received a reconciliation announcement support
message from a peer and it doesn't violate our protocol,
we store the negotiated parameters which will be used
for future reconciliations.
If we're connecting to the peer which might support
transaction reconciliation, we announce we want to reconcile
with them.
We store the reconciliation salt so that when the peer
responds with their salt, we are able to compute the
full reconciliation salt.
This behavior is enabled with a CLI flag.
e899d4ca6f init: limit bip30 exceptions to coinbase txs (Chris Geihsler)
511eb7fdea Ignore problematic blocks in DisconnectBlock (Chris Geihsler)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/22596
When using checklevel=4, block verification fails because of duplicate coinbase transactions involving blocks 91812 and 91722. There was already a check in place within `ConnectBlock` to ignore the problematic blocks, but `DisconnectBlock` did not contain a similar check to ignore these blocks when called from `VerifyDB`.
By ignoring these two blocks in `DisconnectBlock`, the block verification process succeeds at checklevel=4.
(Note to reviewers: this is my first contribution to Bitcoin Core, so any feedback is most welcome. Thanks in advance for reviewing!)
## Steps to reproduce:
Use the following bitcoin.conf file and start bitcoind. I only used block data through block ~100000 so that the verification process was much faster.
```
assumevalid=0
checkblocks=0
checklevel=4
```
Without this change, you will see the following error when the blocks are verified:
```
2022-04-14T02:56:44Z init message: Verifying blocks…
2022-04-14T02:56:44Z Verifying last 101881 blocks at level 4
2022-04-14T02:56:44Z [0%]...[10%]...[20%]...[30%]...[40%]...ERROR: VerifyDB(): *** coin database inconsistencies found (last 10160 blocks, 142571 good transactions before that)
2022-04-14T02:57:01Z : Corrupted block database detected.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
: Corrupted block database detected.
Please restart with -reindex or -reindex-chainstate to recover.
```
With this change, you will see this instead:
```
2022-04-14T02:32:29Z init message: Verifying blocks…
2022-04-14T02:32:29Z Verifying last 101746 blocks at level 4
2022-04-14T02:32:29Z [0%]...[10%]...[20%]...[30%]...[40%]...[50%]...[60%]...[70%]...[80%]...[90%]...[DONE].
2022-04-14T02:32:48Z No coin database inconsistencies in last 101746 blocks (226126 transactions)
```
ACKs for top commit:
laanwj:
Code review ACK e899d4ca6f
achow101:
ACK e899d4ca6f
jamesob:
(Biased) ACK e899d4ca6f ([`jamesob/ackr/24851.2.seejee.init_ignore_bip_30_verif`](https://github.com/jamesob/bitcoin/tree/ackr/24851.2.seejee.init_ignore_bip_30_verif))
Tree-SHA512: d2f6d25e9619aee32c1a73fe846b1b587698eaa5a4994fa6424f1038f45654f9fd52b74a69843cc84d90168d74827130ccf8e9201502f5d52281acdb20429291
a8250e30f1 doc: add release note about `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
5c96020024 doc: add `/deploymentinfo` in REST-interface (brunoerg)
3e44bee08e test: add coverage for `/rest/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
91497031cb rest: add `/deploymentinfo` (brunoerg)
Pull request description:
#23508 added a new RPC named `getdeploymentinfo`, it moved the softfork section from `getblockchaininfo` into this new one. In the REST interface, we have an endpoint named`/rest/chaininfo.json` (which refers to `getblockchaininfo`), so, this PR adds a new REST endpoint named `/deploymentinfo` which refers to `getdeploymentinfo`.
You can use it by passing a block hash, e.g: '/rest/deploymentinfo/<BLOCKHASH>.json' or you can use it without passing a block hash to get the 'deploymentinfo' for the last block.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK a8250e30f1 rebase-only since my last review at c65f82bb
achow101:
ACK a8250e30f1
stickies-v:
re-ACK a8250e30f1
Tree-SHA512: 0735183b6828d51a72ed0e2be5a09b314ac4693f548982c6e9adaa0ef07a55aa428d3b2d1b1de70b83169811a663a8624b686166e5797f624dcc00178b9796e6
8173f160e0 style: rename variables to match coding style (Vasil Dimov)
8b4ad203d0 fees: make FeeFilterRounder::feeset const (Vasil Dimov)
e7a5bf6be7 fees: make the class FeeFilterRounder thread-safe (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Make the class `FeeFilterRounder` thread-safe so that its methods can be called concurrently by different threads on the same object. Currently it has just one method (`round()`).
The second commit is optional, but it improves readability, showing that the `feeset` member will never be changed, thus does not need protection from concurrent access.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
re-ACK 8173f160e0
laanwj:
Code review ACK 8173f160e0
promag:
Code review ACK 8173f160e0
Tree-SHA512: 94b809997c485c0d114fa702d0406b980be8eaaebcfefa56808ed670aa943959c2f16cfd0ef72b4752fe2a409a23af1b4b7f2f236e51212957759569e3bbbefd
bfb9b94ebe wallet: remove duplicate descriptor type check in GetNewDestination (furszy)
76b982a4a5 wallet: remove unused `nAccountingEntryNumber` field (furszy)
599ff5adfc wallet: avoid double TopUp() calls on descriptor wallets (furszy)
Pull request description:
Found it while was digging over a `getnewaddress` timeout on the functional test suite.
### Context:
We are calling `TopUp()` twice in the following flows for descriptor wallets:
A) `CWallet::GetNewDestination`:
1) Calls spk_man->TopUp()
2) Calls spk_man->GetNewDestination() --> which, after the basic script checks, calls TopUp() again.
B) `CWallet::GetReservedDestination`:
1) Calls spk_man->TopUp()
2) Calls spk_man->GetReservedDestination() --> which calls to GetNewDestination (which calls to TopUp again).
### Changes:
Move `TopUp()` responsibility from the wallet class to each scriptpubkeyman.
So each spkm can decide to call it or not after perform the basic checks
for the new destination request.
Aside from that, remove the unused `nAccountingEntryNumber` wallet field. And a duplicated descriptor type check in `GetNewDestination`
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
re-ACK bfb9b94ebe.
achow101:
ACK bfb9b94ebe
theStack:
Code-review ACK bfb9b94ebe
Tree-SHA512: 3ab73f37729e50d6c6a4434f676855bc1fb404619d63c03e5b06ce61c292c09c59d64cb1aa3bd9277b06f26988956991d62c90f9d835884f41ed500b43a12058
a3789c700b Improve getpeerinfo pingtime, minping, and pingwait help docs (Jon Atack)
df660ddb1c Update getpeerinfo/-netinfo/TxRelay#m_relay_txs relaytxes docs (for v24 backport) (Jon Atack)
1f448542e7 Always return getpeerinfo "minfeefilter" field (for v24 backport) (Jon Atack)
9cd6682545 Make getpeerinfo field order consistent with its help (for v24 backport) (Jon Atack)
Pull request description:
Various updates and fixups, mostly targeting v24. Please refer to the commit messages for details.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a3789c700b
brunoerg:
ACK a3789c700b
vasild:
ACK a3789c700b
Tree-SHA512: b8586a9b83c1b18786b5ac1fc1dba91573c13225fc2cfc8d078f4220967c95056354f6be13327f33b4fcf3e9d5310fa4e1bdc93102cbd6574f956698993a54bf
626b7c8493 fuzz: add scanblocks as safe for fuzzing (James O'Beirne)
94fe5453c7 test: rpc: add scanblocks functional test (Jonas Schnelli)
6ef2566b68 rpc: add scanblocks - scan for relevant blocks with descriptors (Jonas Schnelli)
a4258f6e81 rpc: move-only: consolidate blockchain scan args (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Revives #20664. All feedback from the previous PR has either been responded to inline or incorporated here.
---
Major changes from Jonas' PR:
- consolidated arguments for scantxoutset/scanblocks
- substantial cleanup of the functional test
Here's the range-diff (`git range-diff master jonasschnelli/2020/12/filterblocks_rpc jamesob/2021-11-scanblocks`): https://gist.github.com/jamesob/aa4a975344209f0316444b8de2ec1d18
### Original PR description
> The `scanblocks` RPC call allows one to get relevant blockhashes from a set of descriptors by scanning all blockfilters in a given range.
>
> **Example:**
>
> `scanblocks start '["addr(<bitcoin_address>)"]' 661000` (returns relevant blockhashes for `<bitcoin_address>` from blockrange 661000->tip)
>
> ## Why is this useful?
> **Fast wallet rescans**: get the relevant blocks and only rescan those via `rescanblockchain getblockheader(<hash>)[height] getblockheader(<hash>)[height])`. A future PR may add an option to allow to provide an array of blockhashes to `rescanblockchain`.
>
> **prune wallet rescans**: (_needs additional changes_): together with a call to fetch blocks from the p2p network if they have been pruned, it would allow to rescan wallets back to the genesis block in pruned mode (relevant #15946).
>
> **SPV mode** (_needs additional changes_): it would be possible to build the blockfilterindex from the p2p network (rather then deriving them from the blocks) and thus allow some sort of hybrid-SPV mode with moderate bandwidth consumption (related #9483)
ACKs for top commit:
furszy:
diff re-ACK 626b7c8
Tree-SHA512: f84e4dcb851b122b39e9700c58fbc31e899cdcf9b587df9505eaf1f45578cc4253e89ce2a45d1ff21bd213e31ddeedbbcad2c80810f46755b30acc17b07e2873
bf95976061 doc: add note about snapshot chainstate init (James O'Beirne)
e4d7995286 test: add testcases for snapshot initialization (James O'Beirne)
cced4e7336 test: move-only-ish: factor out LoadVerifyActivateChainstate() (James O'Beirne)
51fc9241c0 test: allow on-disk coins and block tree dbs in tests (James O'Beirne)
3c361391b8 test: add reset_chainstate parameter for snapshot unittests (James O'Beirne)
00b357c215 validation: add ResetChainstates() (James O'Beirne)
3a29dfbfb2 move-only: test: make snapshot chainstate setup reusable (James O'Beirne)
8153bd9247 blockmanager: avoid undefined behavior during FlushBlockFile (James O'Beirne)
ad67ff377c validation: remove snapshot datadirs upon validation failure (James O'Beirne)
34d1590331 add utilities for deleting on-disk leveldb data (James O'Beirne)
252abd1e8b init: add utxo snapshot detection (James O'Beirne)
f9f1735f13 validation: rename snapshot chainstate dir (James O'Beirne)
d14bebf100 db: add StoragePath to CDBWrapper/CCoinsViewDB (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
This is part of the [assumeutxo project](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/projects/11) (parent PR: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/15606)
---
Half of the replacement for #24232. The original PR grew larger than expected throughout the review process.
This change adds the ability to initialize a snapshot-based chainstate during init if one is detected on disk. This is of course unused as of now (aside from in unittests) given that we haven't yet enabled actually loading snapshots.
Don't be scared! There are some big move-only commits in here.
Accompanying changes include:
- moving the snapshot coinsdb directory from being called `chainstate_[base blockhash]` to `chainstate_snapshot`, since we only support one snapshot in use at a time. This simplifies some logic, but it necessitates writing that base blockhash out to a file within the coinsdb dir. See [discussion here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24232#discussion_r832762880).
- adding a simple fix in `FlushBlockFile()` that avoids a crash when attemping to flush to disk before `LoadBlockIndexDB()` is called, which happens when calling `MaybeRebalanceCaches()` during multiple chainstate init.
- improving the unittest to allow testing with on-disk chainstates - necessary to test a simulated restart and re-initialization.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
utACK bf95976061
ariard:
Code Review ACK bf9597606
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bf95976061. Changes since last review: rebasing, switching from CAutoFile to AutoFile, adding comments, switching from BOOST_CHECK to Assert in test util, using chainman.GetMutex() in tests, destroying one ChainstateManager before creating a new one in tests
fjahr:
utACK bf95976061
aureleoules:
ACK bf95976061
Tree-SHA512: 15ae75caf19f8d12a12d2647c52897904d27b265a7af6b4ae7b858592eeadb8f9da6c2394b6baebec90adc28742c053e3eb506119577dae7c1e722ebb3b7bcc0
9e386afb67 tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is included correctly (Andrew Chow)
30ff25cf37 psbt: Only include m_tap_tree if it has scripts (Andrew Chow)
0577d423ad psbt: Change m_tap_tree to store just the tuples (Andrew Chow)
22c051ca70 tests: Test that PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE is combined correctly (Andrew Chow)
7df6e1bb77 psbt: Fix merging of m_tap_tree (Andrew Chow)
0652dc53b2 [BugFix]: Do not allow deserializing PSBT with empty PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE (Jeremy Rubin)
Pull request description:
PSBT_OUT_TAP_TREE should not be included for outputs that do not have such a tree. This should be disallowed during parsing, as well as prior to serialization when the field is populated during updating.
Also added some test cases.
Alternative to #25856
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 9e386afb67
darosior:
ACK 9e386afb67
Tree-SHA512: ce5c02a69752d176dbd967c1e8d30129b1905c8f186aeeef034576c1de82059271a1ee846bd040f5be4e66bb77ba711dcf14ac1e597c5707d7e7e2293f6cfefb
b01682a812 refactor: revert m_next_resend to not be std::atomic (stickies-v)
9245f45670 wallet: only update m_next_resend when actually resending (stickies-v)
7fbde8af5c refactor: carve out tx resend timer logic into ShouldResend (stickies-v)
01f3534632 refactor: remove unused locks for ResubmitWalletTransactions (stickies-v)
c6e8e11fb0 wallet: fix capitalization in docstring (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
This PR addresses the outstanding comments/issues from #25768:
- capitalization [typo](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#discussion_r958572522) in docstring
- remove [unused locks](01f3534632) that we previously needed for `ReacceptWalletTransactions()`
- before #25768, only `ResendWalletTransactions()` would reset `m_next_resend` (formerly called `nNextResend`). By unifying it with `ReacceptWalletTransactions()` into `ResubmitWalletTransactions()`, the number of callsites that would reset the `m_next_resend` timer increased
- since `m_next_resend` is only used in case of `relay=true` (formerly `ResendWalletTransactions()`), this is unintuitive
- it leads to [unexpected behaviour](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#issuecomment-1252619427) such as transactions potentially never being rebroadcasted.
- it makes the ResubmitWalletTransactions()` logic [more complicated than strictly necessary](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25768#discussion_r962828563)
- since #25768, we relied on an earlier call of `ResubmitWalletTransactions(relay=false, force=true)` to initialize `m_next_resend()`, I think we can more elegantly do that by just providing `m_next_resend` with a default value
- just to highlight: this commit introduces behaviour change
Note: the `if (!fBroadcastTransactions)` in `CWallet:ShouldResend()` is duplicated on purpose, since it potentially avoids the slightly more expensive `if (!chain().isReadyToBroadcast())` check afterwards. I don't have a strong view on it, so happy to remove that additional check to reduce the diff, too.
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK b01682a812
achow101:
ACK b01682a812
Tree-SHA512: ac5f1d8858f8dd736dd1480f385984d660c1916b62a42562317020e8f9fd6a30bd8f23d973d47e4c9480d744c5ba39fdbefd69568a5eb0589a8422d7e5971c1c
861cb3fadc test: move SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue() before Stop() in txindex_tests (Vasil Dimov)
6526dc3b78 test: silence TSAN false positive in coinstatsindex_initial_sync (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Silence false positives from TSAN about unsynchronized calls to `BaseIndex::~BaseIndex()` and `BaseIndex::SetBestBlockIndex()`. They are synchronized, but beyond the comprehension of TSAN - by `SyncWithValidationInterfaceQueue()`, called from `BaseIndex::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain()`.
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25365
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 861cb3fadc
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 861cb3fadc. Just comment change since last review.
Tree-SHA512: 8c30fdf2fd11d54e9adfa68a67185ab820bd7bd9f7f3ad6456e7e6d219fa9cf6d34b41e98e723eae86cb0c1baef7f3fc57b1b011a13dc3fe3d78334b9b5596de
b527b54950 net: convert standalone SetSocketNonBlocking() to Sock::SetNonBlocking() (Vasil Dimov)
29f66f7682 moveonly: move SetSocketNonBlocking() from netbase to util/sock (Vasil Dimov)
b4bac55679 net: convert standalone IsSelectableSocket() to Sock::IsSelectable() (Vasil Dimov)
5db7d2ca0a moveonly: move IsSelectableSocket() from compat.h to sock.{h,cpp} (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
_This is a piece of #21878, chopped off to ease review._
* convert standalone `IsSelectableSocket()` to `Sock::IsSelectable()`
* convert standalone `SetSocketNonBlocking()` to `Sock::SetNonBlocking()`
This further encapsulates syscalls inside the `Sock` class and makes the callers mockable.
ACKs for top commit:
jonatack:
ACK b527b54950 review/debug build/unit tests at each commit, cross-referenced the changes with `man select` and `man errno`, ran a signet node on the last commit with ip4/ip6//tor/i2p/cjdns and network connections were nominal
dergoegge:
Code review ACK b527b54950
Tree-SHA512: af783ce558c7a89e173f7ab323fb3517103d765c19b5d14de29f64706b4e1fea3653492e8ea73ae972699986aaddf2ae72c7cfaa7dad7614254283083b7d2632
bcb0cacac2 reindex, log, test: fixes#21379 (mruddy)
Pull request description:
Fixes#21379.
The blocks/blk?????.dat files are mutated and become increasingly malformed, or corrupt, as a result of running the re-indexing process.
The mutations occur after the re-indexing process has finished, as new blocks are appended, but are a result of a re-indexing process miscalculation that lingers in the block manager's `m_blockfile_info` `nSize` data until node restart.
These additions to the blk files are non-fatal, but also not desirable.
That is, this is a form of data corruption that the reading code is lenient enough to process (it skips the extra bytes), but it adds some scary looking log messages as it encounters them.
The summary of the problem is that the re-index process double counts the size of the serialization header (magic message start bytes [4 bytes] + length [4 bytes] = 8 bytes) while calculating the blk data file size (both values already account for the serialization header's size, hence why it is over accounted).
This bug manifests itself in a few different ways, after re-indexing, when a new block from a peer is processed:
1. If the new block will not fit into the last blk file processed while re-indexing, while remaining under the 128MiB limit, then the blk file is flushed to disk and truncated to a size that is 8 greater than it should be. The truncation adds zero bytes (see `FlatFileSeq::Flush` and `TruncateFile`).
1. If the last blk file processed while re-indexing has logical space for the new block under the 128 MiB limit:
1. If the blk file was not already large enough to hold the new block, then the zeros are, in effect, added by `fseek` when the file is opened for writing. Eight zero bytes are added to the end of the last blk file just before the new block is written. This happens because the write offset is 8 too great due to the miscalculation. The result is 8 zero bytes between the end of the last block and the beginning of the next block's magic + length + block.
1. If the blk file was already large enough to hold the new block, then the current existing file contents remain in the 8 byte gap between the end of the last block and the beginning of the next block's magic + length + block. Commonly, when this occcurs, it is due to the blk file containing blocks that are not connected to the block tree during reindex and are thus left behind by the reindex process and later overwritten when new blocks are added. The orphaned blocks can be valid blocks, but due to the nature of concurrent block download, the parent may not have been retrieved and written by the time the node was previously shutdown.
ACKs for top commit:
LarryRuane:
tested code-review ACK bcb0cacac2
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK bcb0cacac2. This is a disturbing bug with an easy fix which seems well-worth merging.
mzumsande:
ACK bcb0cacac2 (reviewed code and did some testing, I agree that it fixes the bug).
w0xlt:
tACK bcb0cacac2
Tree-SHA512: acc97927ea712916506772550451136b0f1e5404e92df24cc05e405bb09eb6fe7c3011af3dd34a7723c3db17fda657ae85fa314387e43833791e9169c0febe51
fa08663344 rpc: Return coinbase flag in scantxoutset (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
I guess it can't hurt to return this for someone that wants to know it
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK fa08663344
shaavan:
ACK fa08663344
Tree-SHA512: 04c554b3ed9877bab93ffcf0c1a4430cd41b30c5f4f3bf462a518fc8b3d68832dd85a29e81bd805eaa16e987856933d7a888a8c126f670bb2844bbd5ca1bf902
04526787b5 Validate `port` options (amadeuszpawlik)
f8387c4234 Validate port value in `SplitHostPort` (amadeuszpawlik)
Pull request description:
Validate `port`-options, so that invalid values are rejected early in the startup.
Ports are `uint16_t`s, which effectively limits a port's value to <=65535. As discussed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24116 and https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/24344, port "0" is considered invalid too.
Proposed in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/21893#issuecomment-835784223
The `SplitHostPort(std::string in, uint16_t& portOut, std::string& hostOut)` now returns a bool that indicates whether the port value was set and within the allowed range. This is an improvement that can be used not only for port validation of options at startup, but also in rpc calls, etc,
ACKs for top commit:
luke-jr:
utACK 04526787b5
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 04526787b5. Just suggested changes since last review: reverting some SplitHostPort changes, adding release notes, avoiding 'GetArgs[0]` problem.
Tree-SHA512: f1ac80bf98520b287a6413ceadb41bc3a93c491955de9b9319ee1298ac0ab982751905762a287e748997ead6198a8bb7a3bc8817ac9e3d2468e11ab4a0f8496d
75c3f9f880 sync: rename AnnotatedMixin::UniqueLock to AnnotatedMixin::unique_lock (Vasil Dimov)
8d9ee8efe8 sync: remove DebugLock alias template (Vasil Dimov)
4b2e16763f sync: avoid confusing name overlap (Mutex) (Vasil Dimov)
9d7ae4b66c sync: remove unused template parameter from ::UniqueLock (Vasil Dimov)
11c190e3f1 sync: simplify MaybeCheckNotHeld() definitions by using a template (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
Summary:
* Reduce 4 of the `MaybeCheckNotHeld()` definitions to 2 by using a template.
* Remove unused template parameter from `::UniqueLock`.
* Use `MutexType` instead of `Mutex` for a template parameter name to avoid overlap/confusion with the `Mutex` class.
* Rename `AnnotatedMixin::UniqueLock` to `AnnotatedMixin::unique_lock` to avoid overlap/confusion with the global `UniqueLock` and for consistency with `UniqueLock::reverse_lock`.
The first commit `sync: simplify MaybeCheckNotHeld() definitions by using a template` is also part of https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25390
ACKs for top commit:
aureleoules:
ACK 75c3f9f880 - LGTM
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 75c3f9f880. Nice cleanups! Just suggested changes since last review: keeping UniqueLock name and fixing a missed rename in a code comment
Tree-SHA512: ec261f6a444bdfe4f06e844b57b3606fdd9b2f842647cae15266d9729970d87585c808d482fbba0b31c33a4aa03527c36e282c92b28d9052711f75a7048c96f1
fabf1cdb20 Use steady clock for bench logging (MacroFake)
faed342a23 scripted-diff: Rename time symbols (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
Instead of using `0.001` and similar constants to "convert" an int64_t to milliseconds, use the type-safe `Ticks<>` helper. Also, use steady clock instead of system clock, since the durations are used for benchmarking.
ACKs for top commit:
fanquake:
ACK fabf1cdb20 - validation bench output still looks sane.
Tree-SHA512: e6525b5fdad6045ca500c56014897d7428ad288aaf375933d3b5939feddf257f6910d562eb66ebcde9186bef9a604ee8d763a318253838318d59df2a285be7c2
43b8777dc3 refactor: move run_command from util to common (Cory Fields)
192325a77d kernel: move RunCommandParseJSON to its own file (Cory Fields)
Pull request description:
Because libbitcoinkernel does not include this new object, this has the side-effect of eliminating its unnecessary `boost::process` dependency.
This leaves libbitcoinkernel with 3 remaining boost dependencies:
- `boost::date_time` for `util/time.cpp`, which I'll separate out next. Exactly like this PR.
- `boost::signals2` for which I have a POC re-implementation here: https://github.com/theuni/bitcoin/commits/replace-boost-signals
- `boost::multi_index` which I'm not sure about yet.
ACKs for top commit:
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 43b8777dc3. Could consider squashing the two commits, so the code just moves once instead of twice.
fanquake:
ACK 43b8777dc3
Tree-SHA512: f2a46cac34aaadfb8a1442316152ad354f6990021b82c78d80cae9fd43cd026209ffd62132eaa99d5d0f8cf34e996b6737d318a9d9a3f1d2ff8d17d697abf26d
1c36bafc5f wallet: have prune error take precedence over assumedvalid (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Fixes https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/23997#discussion_r891412739.
From Russ Yanofsky:
> Agree with all of Marco's points here and think this should be updated
>
> If havePrune and hasAssumedValidChain are both true, better to show havePrune error message. Assumed-valid error message is vague and not very actionable. Would suggest "Error loading wallet. Wallet requires blocks to be downloaded, and software does not currently support loading wallets while blocks are being downloaded out of order though assumeutxo snapshots. Wallet should be able to load successfully after node sync reaches height {block_height}"
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
ACK 1c36bafc5f
aureleoules:
ACK 1c36bafc5f
Tree-SHA512: bfb0024bb962525cbbd392ade3c0331a8b0525e7f2f2ab52b2dbb9b6dd6311070d85ecb762a7689db84a30991971865698ab6fec187206e6a92133790c5a91dc
faa15527d7 test: Use dedicated mempool in TestBasicMining (MacroFake)
fafab384a0 test: Use dedicated mempool in TestPackageSelection (MacroFake)
fa4055d79c test: Use dedicated mempool in TestPrioritisedMining (MacroFake)
fa29218285 test: Pass mempool reference to AssemblerForTest (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
This cleans up the miner tests:
* Removes duplicate/redundant and thus confusing chainparams object.
* Uses a fresh mempool for each subtest instead of using the "global" one from the testing setup. This makes it easier to follow the tests in smaller scopes. Also it makes sure the mempool is truly cleared by reconstructing it. Finally, this removes calls to `clear`, see https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19909
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
utACK faa15527d7
Tree-SHA512: ced1260f6ab70fba74b0fac7ff4fc7adfddcd2f3bee785249d2a4a9055ac253eff9090edbda7a17e72a71a81b56ff708d5ff64e1f57ebc7b7747d6c88fec51e3
adb1714426 Fix comment typos in scriptpubkeyman.cpp, wallet.cpp, wallet.h (Dimitris Tsapakidis)
Pull request description:
Fixes a number of comment typos found in the code.
Top commit has no ACKs.
Tree-SHA512: c2c996b66d33ecf0ee734b76303a0f2444e184d2f3ff6931768712ca51011ad51e54336c33a2ff55133766d20ae6adcbb14ddc754dde58b1fe9167d68f54fec5
Use `UniqueLock` directly. Type deduction works just fine from the first
argument to the constructor of `UniqueLock`, so there is no need to
repeat
```cpp
UniqueLock<typename std::remove_reference<typename std::remove_pointer<decltype(cs)>::type>::type>
```
five times in the `LOCK` macros. Just `UniqueLock` suffices.
Use `MutexType` instead of `Mutex` for the template parameter of
`UniqueLock` because there is already a class named `Mutex` and the
naming overlap is confusing. `MutexType` is used elsewhere in `sync.h`.
8891949bdc index: Improve BaseIndex::BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain reliability (Ryan Ofsky)
Pull request description:
Since commit f08c9fb0c6 from PR https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21726, index `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` behavior has been less reliable, and there has also been a race condition in the `coinstatsindex_initial_sync` unit test.
It seems better for `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` to actually wait for the last connected block to be fully processed, than to be able to return before prune locks are set, so this switches the order of `m_best_block_index = block;` and `UpdatePruneLock` statements in `SetBestBlockIndex` to make it more reliable.
Also since commit f08c9fb0c6, there has been a race condition in the `coinstatsindex_initial_sync` test. Before that commit, the atomic index best block pointer `m_best_block_index` was updated as the last step of `BaseIndex::BlockConnected`, so `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` could safely be used in tests to wait for the last `BlockConnected` notification to be finished before stopping and destroying the index. But after that commit, calling `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` is no longer sufficient, and there is a race between the test shutdown code which destroys the index object and the new code introduced in that commit calling `AllowPrune()` and `GetName()` on the index object. Reproducibility instructions for this are in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25365#issuecomment-1259744133
This commit fixes the `coinstatsindex_initial_sync` race condition, even though it will require an additional change to silence TSAN false positives, https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26188, after it is fixed. So this partially addresses but does not resolve the bug reporting TSAN errors https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25365.
There is no known race condition outside of test code currently, because the bitcoind `Shutdown` function calls `FlushBackgroundCallbacks` not `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` to safely shut down.
Co-authored-by: vasild
Co-authored-by: MarcoFalke
ACKs for top commit:
mzumsande:
re-ACK 8891949bdc
Tree-SHA512: 52e29e3772a0c92873c54e5ffb31dd66a909b68a2031b7585713cd1d976811289c98bd9bb41679a8689062f03be4f97bb8368696e789caa4607c2fd8b1fe289b
fabbbe32ee Remove unused CDataStream::rdbuf method (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
It is unused and seems unlikely to be ever used.
ACKs for top commit:
theStack:
Code-review ACK fabbbe32ee
aureleoules:
ACK fabbbe32ee
Tree-SHA512: 5804642658f96a0fb51482ebf3a062bb0f997c1e0527455afa4aceeeb6c1ad139a98b14a7c8a0909daba733a83bdc24fcadad45060ead4be6eb3dc3e66c129e2
33b12e5df6 docs: improve docs where MemPoolLimits is used (stickies-v)
6945853c0b test: use NoLimits() in MempoolIndexingTest (stickies-v)
3a86f24a4c refactor: mempool: use CTxMempool::Limits (stickies-v)
b85af25f87 refactor: mempool: add MemPoolLimits::NoLimits() (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Mempool currently considers 4 limits regarding ancestor and descendant count and size, which get passed around between functions quite a bit. This PR uses `CTxMemPool::Limits` introduced in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/25290 to simplify those signatures and callsites.
The purpose of this PR is to improve readability and maintenance, without behaviour change.
As noted in the first commit "refactor: mempool: change MemPoolLimits members to uint", we currently have an underflow issue where a user could pass a negative `-limitancestorsize`, which is eventually cast to an unsigned integer. This behaviour already exists. Because it's orthogonal and to minimize scope, I think this should be fixed in a separate PR.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 33b12e5df6, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
glozow:
reACK 33b12e5df6
Tree-SHA512: 591c6dcee1894f1c3ca28b34a680eeadcf0d40cda92451b4a422c03087b27d682b5e30ba4367abd75a99b5ccb115b7884b0026958d3c7dddab030549db5a4056
01bf4af4f2 docs: fix m_children to be a member of CTxMemPoolEntry (stickies-v)
Pull request description:
Small documentation fix to reflect that `m_children` [is a member](73b61717a9/src/txmempool.h (L99)) of `CTxMemPoolEntry`, not `CTxMemPool`
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 01bf4af4f2, wrong wording was introduced in bitcoin/bitcoin#19478.
glozow:
ACK 01bf4af4f2
Tree-SHA512: b66c43b92fda44682b1f67c43073ca9e133a6dc03cd28253e571e67170531138c20b22ffdb08f312fb2d47a1f869b876611646b54325c8b614d12049befad578
From Russ Yanofsky:
"Agree with all of Marco's points here and think this should be updated
If havePrune and hasAssumedValidChain are both true, better to show
havePrune error message. Assumed-valid error message is vague and not
very actionable. Would suggest "Error loading wallet. Wallet requires
blocks to be downloaded, and software does not currently support loading
wallets while blocks are being downloaded out of order though assumeutxo
snapshots. Wallet should be able to load successfully after node sync
reaches height {block_height}"
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <MarcoFalke@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Russ Yanofsky <russ@yanofsky.org>
Help from `bitcoind -h` states that conf can only be used from the commandline.
However, if conf is set in a bitcoin.conf file, it is ignored but there is no error.
Show an error to user if conf is set in a .conf file and prompt them to use
`includeconf` if they wish to specify additional config files.
Adds `IsConfSupported` function to allow for easily adding conf options
to disallow or throw warnings for.
Instead of having an entire TaprootBuilder which may or may not be
complete, and could potentially have future changes that interact oddly
with taproot tree tuples, have m_tap_tree be just the tuples.
When needed in other a TaprootBuilder for actual use, the tuples will be
added to a a TaprootBuilder that, in the future, can take in whatever
other data is needed as well.
Merging should be checking that the current PSBTOutput doesn't have a
taptree and the other one's is copied over. The original merging had
this inverted and would remove m_tap_tree if the other did not have it.
0f40d65321 refactor: remove duplicate code from BlockAssembler (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
Found while reminding myself how transactions are chosen for blocks. Take it or leave it!
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK 0f40d65321
theStack:
Concept and code-review ACK 0f40d65321
Tree-SHA512: 8a2694e670ce3fe897ab8f64f64c8df5f8487fc1264527a3abbcba0e5b921fb693416497ccd62508295bc33f202c65556b91b6af463acb91aab43138d2492c14
2147483647 is the maximum positive value of a signed int32, and - currently -
the maximum value that the deriveaddresses bitcoin RPC call accepts as
derivation index due to its input validation routines.
Before this change, when the derivation index (and thus range_end) reached
std::numeric_limits<int_32_t>::max(), the "i" variable in the for cycle (which
is declared as int, and as such 32 bits in size on most platforms) would be
incremented at the end of the first iteration and then warp back to
-2147483648. This caused SIGABRT in bitcoind and a core dump.
This change assigns "i" an explicit size of 64 bits on every platform,
sidestepping the problem.
Fixes#26274.
Check `port` options for invalid values (ports are parsed as uint16, so
in practice values >65535 are invalid; port 0 is undefined and therefore
considered invalid too). This allows for an early rejection of faulty
values and an supplying an informative message to the user.
Splits tests in `feature_proxy.py` to cover both invalid `hostname`
and `port` values.
Adds a release-note as previously valid `-port` and `-rpcport` values
can now result in errors.
Forward the validation of the port from `ParseUInt16(...)`.
Consider port 0 as invalid.
Add suitable test for the `SplitHostPort` function.
Add doxygen description to the `SplitHostPort` function.
Since commit f08c9fb0c6 from PR
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/21726, index
`BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` behavior has been less reliable, and there has
also been a race condition in the `coinstatsindex_initial_sync` unit test.
It seems better for `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` to actually wait for the
last connected block to be fully processed, than to be able to return before
prune locks are set, so this switches the order of `m_best_block_index =
block;` and `UpdatePruneLock` statements in `SetBestBlockIndex` to make it more
reliable.
Also since commit f08c9fb0c6, there has been a
race condition in the `coinstatsindex_initial_sync` test. Before that commit,
the atomic index best block pointer `m_best_block_index` was updated as the
last step of `BaseIndex::BlockConnected`, so `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain`
could safely be used in tests to wait for the last `BlockConnected`
notification to be finished before stopping and destroying the index. But
after that commit, calling `BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` is no longer
sufficient, and there is a race between the test shutdown code which destroys
the index object and the new code introduced in that commit calling
`AllowPrune()` and `GetName()` on the index object. Reproducibility
instructions for this are in
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25365#issuecomment-1259744133
This commit fixes the `coinstatsindex_initial_sync` race condition, even though
it will require an additional change to silence TSAN false positives,
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26188, after it is fixed. So this
partially addresses but does not resolve the bug reporting TSAN errors
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/25365.
There is no known race condition outside of test code currently, because the
bitcoind `Shutdown` function calls `FlushBackgroundCallbacks` not
`BlockUntilSyncedToCurrentChain` to safely shut down.
Co-authored-by: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
Co-authored-by: MacroFake <falke.marco@gmail.com>
During connection setup for a peer, getpeerinfo returns "version": 0, "subver": ""
and the GUI Peers window displays 0 and an empty field, respectively.
Give these fields the same behavior as the other fields in the GUI Peers window:
display the fallback value in src/qt/forms/debugwindow.ui (i.e. "N/A") until a
valid result is available after the peer connection completes.
The (100, 1000000, 1000, 1000000) limits are arbitrarily high and
don't restrict anything, they are just meant to calculate ancestors
properly. Using NoLimits() makes this intent more clear and simplifies
the code.
Simplifies function signatures by removing repetition of all the
ancestor/descendant limits, and increases readability by being
more verbose by naming the limits, while still reducing the LoC.
There are quite a few places in the codebase that require us to
construct a CTxMemPool without limits on ancestors and descendants.
This helper function allows us to get rid of all that duplication.
8a6b6dfcd8 fuzz: pass max fee into ConsumeTxMemPoolEntry (fanquake)
eb15569280 fuzz: add util/mempool/h.cpp (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Moving the heavy (Boost) mempool code out of fuzz/util.h. Means that (for ex) a crypto_common fuzz unit doesn't need to care about seeing endless Boost headers. This results in a ~10% speedup (for me) when compiling the fuzz tests. Your results may vary.
ACKs for top commit:
MarcoFalke:
review ACK 8a6b6dfcd8🍮
Tree-SHA512: 27dc9d9581ac0b1b319cc0dc08fe5f8fbf9269386a5cb23f6fd5d8231bf015ed942ab4414d8001220541be0013756354578ddab1fec607c6fba04daf421bc870
Quoting ryanofsky: "util can be the library for things included in the kernel
which the kernel can depend on, and common can be the library for other code
that needs to be shared internally, but should not be part of the kernel or
shared externally."
7d14577d0f refactor: move DEFAULT_BLOCKFILTERINDEX from val to blockfilterindex (fanquake)
c87d569189 refactor: move DEFAULT_COINSTATSINDEX from validation to coinstatsindex (fanquake)
2bfc1e6aaa refactor: move DEFAULT_TXINDEX from validation to txindex (fanquake)
Pull request description:
Move `*index` default constants out of `validation.h`.
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK 7d14577d0f
aureleoules:
ACK 7d14577d0f
Tree-SHA512: 3021db1a63ceb714dee4b91f755d1fb9a6633adb6f1081e34e4179900e7543e3a7b06fe47507d580a3a2caf52f7ede784cb36716d521c76b0404bdc798f0186a
4bee62e9b8 kernel: remove util/bytevectorhash.cpp (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This is no-longer used.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
ACK 4bee62e9b8, I have reviewed the code and it looks OK, I agree it can be merged.
Tree-SHA512: 4d61f87b640ef3c759008631433b3e6d2bd2ac54bbe0b287f32ea1569760048f17a66cfe846b94ec458a7db5d064be6da59299b9280572a3dc649df60760c63f
d0d9cf7aea test: Check external coin effective value is used in CoinSelection (Aurèle Oulès)
76b79c1a17 wallet: Use correct effective value when checking target (Aurèle Oulès)
Pull request description:
Fixes#26185. The following assert failed because it was not checked in the parent function.
2bd9aa5a44/src/wallet/coinselection.cpp (L391)
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
reACK d0d9cf7aea
furszy:
ACK d0d9cf7a
Tree-SHA512: e126daba1115e9d143f2a582c6953e7ea55e96853b6e819c7744fd7a23668f7d9854681d43ef55d8774655bc54e7e87c1c9fccd746d9e30fbf3caa82ef808ae9
30cc1c6609 refactor: Drop `owns_lock()` call (Hennadii Stepanov)
bff4e068b6 refactor: Do not discard `try_lock()` return value (Hennadii Stepanov)
Pull request description:
Microsoft's C++ Standard Library uses the `[[nodiscard]]` attribute for `try_lock()`.
See: https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/main/stl/inc/mutex
This change allows to drop the current suppression for the warning C4838 and helps to prevent the upcoming warning C4858.
See: 539c26c923Fixesbitcoin/bitcoin#26017.
Split from bitcoin/bitcoin#25819.
ACKs for top commit:
vasild:
ACK 30cc1c6609
Tree-SHA512: ce17404e1c78af4f763129753caf8e5a0e1c91ba398778fe912f9fcc56a847e8112460d1a1a35bf905a593b7d8e0b16c6b099ad74976b67dca5f4f3eda6ff621
9cbfe40d8a net: remove useless call to IsReachable() from CConnman::Bind() (Vasil Dimov)
Pull request description:
`CConnman::Bind()` is called without `BF_EXPLICIT` only when passed
either `0.0.0.0` or `::`. For those addresses `IsReachable()` is always
true (regardless of the `-onlynet=` setting!), meaning that the `if`
condition never evaluates to true.
`IsReachable()` is always true for the "any" IPv4 and IPv6 addresses
because `CNetAddr::GetNetwork()` returns `NET_UNROUTABLE` instead of
`NET_IPV4` or `NET_IPV6` and the network `NET_UNROUTABLE` is always
considered reachable.
It follows that `BF_EXPLICIT` is unnecessary, remove it too.
ACKs for top commit:
naumenkogs:
ACK 9cbfe40d8a
aureleoules:
ACK 9cbfe40d8a
mzumsande:
ACK 9cbfe40d8a
Tree-SHA512: 4e53ee8a73ddd133fd4ff25635135b65e5c19d1fc56fe5c30337406560664616c0adff414dca47602948919f34c81073aae6bfc2871509f3912663d86750928e
079cf88c0d refactor: move Boost datetime usage to wallet (fanquake)
Pull request description:
This means we don't need Boost Datetime in a `--disable-wallet` build, and it isn't included in the kernel (via time.h/cpp). Split from a larger boost removal branch/effort.
ACKs for top commit:
hebasto:
re-ACK 079cf88c0d
aureleoules:
re-ACK 079cf88c0d - rebased and two additional unit tests since my last review.
jarolrod:
crACK 079cf88c0d
Tree-SHA512: c84f47158a4f21902f211c059d8c4bd55ffe95a256835deee723653be08cca49eeddfc33a2316b0cd31805e81cf77eaa39c6c9dcff4cda11a26ba4c1c143974e
9d14f27bdd log: log RPC port on startup (James O'Beirne)
Pull request description:
I just spent a few hours trying to figure out why "18444" wasn't getting me to regtest's RPC server. I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed, but I was maybe understandably confused because "Bound to 127.0.0.1:18445" appears in the logs, which I assumed was the P2P port.
This change logs the RPC listening address by default on startup, which seems like a basic piece of information that shouldn't be buried under `-debug`.
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK 9d14f27bdd
jarolrod:
ACK 9d14f27bdd
aureleoules:
ACK 9d14f27bdd
Tree-SHA512: 5c86f018c0b8d6264abf878c921afe53033b23ab4cf289276bb1ed28fdf591c9d8871a4baa4098c363cb2aa9a637d2e4e18e56b14dfc7d767ee40757d7ff2e7c
Since m_next_resend is now only called from MaybeResendWalletTxs()
we don't have any potential race conditions anymore, so the usage
of std::atomic can be reverted.
We only want to relay our resubmitted transactions once every 12-36h.
By separating the timer update logic out of ResubmitWalletTransactions
and into MaybeResendWalletTxs we avoid non-relay calls (previously in
the separate ReacceptWalletTransactions function) from resetting that
timer.
Moves the logic of whether or not transactions should actually be
resent out of the function that's resending them. This reduces
responsibilities of ResubmitWalletTransactions and allows
carving out the updating of m_next_resend in a future commit.
fa2c72dda0 rpc: Set RPCArg options with designated initializers (MacroFake)
Pull request description:
For optional constructor arguments, use a new struct. This comes with two benefits:
* Earlier unused optional arguments can be omitted
* Designated initializers can be used
ACKs for top commit:
stickies-v:
re-ACK fa2c72dda0
Tree-SHA512: 2a0619548187cc7437fee2466ac4780746490622f202659f53641be01bc2a1fea4416d1a77f3e963bf7c4cce62899b61fab0b9683440cf82f68be44f63826658
Microsoft's C++ Standard Library uses the `[[nodiscard]]` attribute for
`try_lock()`.
See: https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/main/stl/inc/mutex
This change allows to drop the current suppression for the warning C4838
and helps to prevent the upcoming warning C4858.
See: 539c26c923
bdcafb9133 p2p: ProcessHeadersMessage(): fix received_new_header (Larry Ruane)
Pull request description:
Follow-up to #25717. The commit "Utilize anti-DoS headers download strategy" changed how this bool variable is computed, so that its value is now the opposite of what it should be.
Prior to #25717:
```
bool received_new_header{WITH_LOCK(::cs_main, return m_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(headers.back().GetHash()) == nullptr)};
```
After #25717 (simplified):
```
{
LOCK(cs_main);
last_received_header = m_chainman.m_blockman.LookupBlockIndex(headers.back().GetHash());
}
bool received_new_header{last_received_header != nullptr};
```
ACKs for top commit:
dergoegge:
ACK bdcafb9133
glozow:
ACK bdcafb9133, I believe this is correct and don't see anything to suggest the switch was intentional.
stickies-v:
ACK bdcafb9133
Tree-SHA512: 35c12762f1429585a0b1c15053e310e83efb28c3d8cbf4092fad9fe81c893f6d766df1f2b20624882acb9654d0539a0c871f587d7090dc2a198115adf59db3ec
810c3dc7ef doc, rpc: mention that `listdescriptors` result is sorted by string representation (Sebastian Falbesoner)
d99af861d0 test: check that `listdescriptors` descriptor strings are sorted (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This small PR adds a test for the change introduced in PR #25931 ("rpc: sort listdescriptors result", commit 50996241f2). The correctness of the test can easily be verified by commenting out the `std::sort` call in the `listdescriptors` RPC implementation:
```diff
diff --git a/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp b/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp
index 09c74ea2da..3ed1a69b26 100644
--- a/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp
+++ b/src/wallet/rpc/backup.cpp
@@ -1829,9 +1829,11 @@ RPCHelpMan listdescriptors()
});
}
+ /*
std::sort(wallet_descriptors.begin(), wallet_descriptors.end(), [](const auto& a, const auto& b) {
return a.descriptor < b.descriptor;
});
+ */
UniValue descriptors(UniValue::VARR);
for (const WalletDescInfo& info : wallet_descriptors) {
```
leading to a fail of the functional test `wallet_listdescriptors.py`.
ACKs for top commit:
jarolrod:
ACK 810c3dc7ef
aureleoules:
ACK 810c3dc7ef
Tree-SHA512: 31770e3149b8a0251ecfa8662a2270c149f778eb910985f48a91d6a5d288b7b1c2244f9f1b798ebe3f1aa9f0b935cb4d6f12d5d28f78bcde3c4a61af76d11d0a
553ff452c0 build: remove stdlib.h from header checks (fanquake)
a63d4cb26a refactor: use <cstdlib> over stdlib.h (fanquake)
Pull request description:
We already use a mix of `<cstlib>` and `stdlib.h` unconditionally throughout
the codebase.
Us checking this header also duplicates work already done by autotools.
Currently stdlib.h is checked for 3 times during a ./configure run, after
this change, at least it's only twice.
Similar to #26150.
ACKs for top commit:
kristapsk:
ACK 553ff452c0
TheCharlatan:
ACK 553ff452c0
Tree-SHA512: 0a43d39d3df180a1614dbd3a1ee1531b0969ffe4a0c09dfe9d2f3f0ec16196b5fd7523309f6722936a8c8b20908508724e1903e939dd81c3b4538d85d0f42953
a60d9eb9e6 Bugfix: Wallet: Lock cs_wallet for SignMessage (Luke Dashjr)
Pull request description:
cs_desc_main is typically locked within scope of a cs_wallet lock, but:
CWallet::IsLocked locks cs_wallet
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetKeys
...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::GetSigningProvider which locks cs_desc_main first, but has no access to cs_wallet ...called from DescriptorScriptPubKeyMan::SignMessage ...called from CWallet::SignMessage which can access and lock cs_wallet
Resolve the out of order locks by grabbing cs_wallet in CWallet::SignMessage first
-------------
Note this is currently only an issue for the GUI (which lacks sufficient testing apparently), but can be reproduced by #26082 (CI fails as a result)
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK a60d9eb9e6
w0xlt:
ACK a60d9eb9e6
Tree-SHA512: 60f6959b0ceaf4d9339ba1a47154734034b637c41b1f9e26748a2dbbc3a2a95fc3696019103c55ae70c91d910ba8f3d7f4e27d263030eb60b689f290c4d82ea9
Follow-up to #25717. The commit "Utilize anti-DoS headers download
strategy" changed how this bool variable is computed, so that its value
is now the opposite of what it should be.
to the current p2p behavior. We only initialize the Peer::TxRelay m_relay_txs
data structure if it isn't an outbound block-relay-only connection and fRelay=true
(the peer wishes to receive tx announcements) or we're offering NODE_BLOOM to this peer.
