Topic will indicate if transaction came from mempool or block so developers can handle the transaction accordingly without a RPC round trip to bitcoind.
(includes ZMQ: Making CWallet::TransactionAddedToWallet static)
4bfaad4eca chainparams, assumeutxo: Fix signet txoutset hash (Fabian Jahr)
a503cd0f0b chainparams, assumeutxo: Fix testnet txoutset hash (Fabian Jahr)
f6213929c5 assumeutxo: Check deserialized coins for out of range values (Fabian Jahr)
66865446a7 docs: Add release notes for #28685 (Fabian Jahr)
cb0336817e scripted-diff: Rename hash_serialized_2 to hash_serialized_3 (Fabian Jahr)
351370a1d2 coinstats: Fix hash_serialized2 calculation (Fabian Jahr)
Pull request description:
Closes#28675
The last commit demonstrates that theStack's analysis [here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/28675#issuecomment-1770389468) seems to be correct. There will be more changes needed for the rest of the test suite but the `feature_assumeutxo.py` with my additional tests pass.
ACKs for top commit:
achow101:
ACK 4bfaad4eca
theStack:
Code-review ACK 4bfaad4eca
ryanofsky:
Code review ACK 4bfaad4eca
Tree-SHA512: 2f6abc92b282f7c5da46391803cf0804d13978d191d541f2509b532c538abccd0a081e46cda23d80d47206a05fa2b5d41b7ab246e6a263db7a7461d6292116ef
03f82087f6 doc: assumeutxo prune and index notes (Sjors Provoost)
Pull request description:
Based on recent comments on #27596.
ACKs for top commit:
pablomartin4btc:
re ACK 03f82087f6
ryanofsky:
ACK 03f82087f6. Nice changes, these seem like very helpful notes
Tree-SHA512: fe651b49f4d667400a3655899f27a96dd1eaf67cf9215fb35db5f44fb8c0313e7d541518be6791fec93392df24b909793f3886adb808e53228ed2a291165639d
1b672eb766 doc: add release note for #27460 (new `importmempool` RPC) (Sebastian Falbesoner)
Pull request description:
This PR adds a missing release note for #27460.
ACKs for top commit:
glozow:
ACK 1b672eb766
Tree-SHA512: 89deadbfd6779e6eb19801c9fe7459a9876b920d44e09df102774c1eb8b3c0716462613dc99d1711eda4bd959ea61595b33f4528424ac02cf1af6cb4e5f1f0e9
5b878be742 [doc] add release note for submitpackage (glozow)
7a9bb2a2a5 [rpc] allow submitpackage to be called outside of regtest (glozow)
5b9087a9a7 [rpc] require package to be a tree in submitpackage (glozow)
e32ba1599c [txpackages] IsChildWithParentsTree() (glozow)
b4f28cc345 [doc] parent pay for child in aggregate CheckFeeRate (glozow)
Pull request description:
Permit (restricted topology) submitpackage RPC outside of regtest. Suggested in https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/26933#issuecomment-1510851570
This RPC should be safe but still experimental - interface may change, not all features (e.g. package RBF) are implemented, etc. If a miner wants to expose this to people, they can effectively use "package relay" before the p2p changes are implemented. However, please note **this is not package relay**; transactions submitted this way will not relay to other nodes if the feerates are below their mempool min fee. Users should put this behind some kind of rate limit or permissions.
ACKs for top commit:
instagibbs:
ACK 5b878be742
achow101:
ACK 5b878be742
dergoegge:
Code review ACK 5b878be742
ajtowns:
ACK 5b878be742
ariard:
Code Review ACK 5b878be742. Though didn’t manually test the PR.
Tree-SHA512: 610365c0b2ffcccd55dedd1151879c82de1027e3319712bcb11d54f2467afaae4d05dca5f4b25f03354c80845fef538d3938b958174dda8b14c10670537a6524
