mirror of
https://github.com/Retropex/bitcoin.git
synced 2025-05-12 19:20:42 +02:00
Warn in the debug log (only) for blocks where the block version is being abused
This commit is contained in:
parent
c38f2685f4
commit
24462fde47
@ -3053,12 +3053,20 @@ void Chainstate::UpdateTip(const CBlockIndex* pindexNew)
|
||||
warning_messages.push_back(warning);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
auto warning_messages_joined = util::Join(warning_messages, Untranslated(", "));
|
||||
UpdateTipLog(coins_tip, pindexNew, params, __func__, "",
|
||||
warning_messages_joined.original);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!warning_messages.empty()) {
|
||||
auto warning_messages_joined = util::Join(warning_messages, Untranslated(", "));
|
||||
m_chainman.GetNotifications().warningSet(kernel::Warning::UNKNOWN_NEW_RULES_ACTIVATED, warning_messages_joined, /*update=*/true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static constexpr int32_t BIP320_MASK = 0x1fffe000UL;
|
||||
if ((pindexNew->nVersion & BIP320_MASK) && pindexNew->nVersion != m_chainman.m_versionbitscache.ComputeBlockVersion(pindexNew->pprev, params.GetConsensus())) {
|
||||
const auto warning = _("Miner violated version bit protocol");
|
||||
warning_messages.push_back(warning);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
UpdateTipLog(coins_tip, pindexNew, params, __func__, "",
|
||||
util::Join(warning_messages, Untranslated(", ")).original);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Disconnect m_chain's tip.
|
||||
|
@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ WARN_UNKNOWN_BIT_MINED = f"Warning: Miners are attempting to activate unknown ne
|
||||
# NOTE: WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED includes VB_UNKNOWN_BIT because it persists from the earlier check
|
||||
WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED = f"Warning: Miners are attempting to activate unknown new rules (bit {VB_UNKNOWN_BIT}, {VB_BIP320_BIT})"
|
||||
WARN_UNKNOWN_RULES_ACTIVE = f"Unknown new rules activated (versionbit {VB_UNKNOWN_BIT})"
|
||||
WARN_BIP320_BLOCK = "Miner violated version bit protocol"
|
||||
VB_PATTERN = re.compile("Unknown new rules activated.*versionbit")
|
||||
|
||||
class VersionBitsWarningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
@ -112,18 +113,29 @@ class VersionBitsWarningTest(BitcoinTestFramework):
|
||||
assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_BIT_MINED in ",".join(node.getmininginfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
assert(WARN_UNKNOWN_BIT_MINED in ",".join(node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Check that there is a warning if >75 blocks in the last 100 were a BIP320 version")
|
||||
self.send_blocks_with_version(peer, VB_BIP320_THRESHOLD - 1, VB_BIP320_VERSION)
|
||||
self.log.info("Check that there is a warning if BIP320 is used, and a second persistent warning if >75 blocks in the last 100 were a BIP320 version")
|
||||
with node.busy_wait_for_debug_log([WARN_BIP320_BLOCK.encode('ascii')]):
|
||||
self.send_blocks_with_version(peer, VB_BIP320_THRESHOLD - 1, VB_BIP320_VERSION)
|
||||
# Check that get*info() doesn't shows the 76/100 unknown block version warning yet.
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED not in ",".join(node.getmininginfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED not in ",".join(node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
self.send_blocks_with_version(peer, 1, VB_BIP320_VERSION)
|
||||
# ...and it shouldn't show the BIP320-specific warning
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BLOCK not in node.getmininginfo()["warnings"])
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BLOCK not in node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
|
||||
with node.busy_wait_for_debug_log([WARN_BIP320_BLOCK.encode('ascii'), b'Enqueuing UpdatedBlockTip']):
|
||||
self.send_blocks_with_version(peer, 1, VB_BIP320_VERSION)
|
||||
# Check that get*info() shows the 76/100 unknown block version warning.
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED in ",".join(node.getmininginfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED in ",".join(node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
self.generatetoaddress(node, 1, node_deterministic_address)
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BLOCK not in node.getmininginfo()["warnings"])
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BLOCK not in node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
|
||||
with node.busy_wait_for_debug_log([b'Enqueuing UpdatedBlockTip'], forbid_msgs=[WARN_BIP320_BLOCK.encode('ascii')]):
|
||||
self.generatetoaddress(node, 1, node_deterministic_address)
|
||||
# Only the 76/100 should persist
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED in ",".join(node.getmininginfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BIT_MINED in ",".join(node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"]))
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BLOCK not in node.getmininginfo()["warnings"])
|
||||
assert(WARN_BIP320_BLOCK not in node.getnetworkinfo()["warnings"])
|
||||
self.generatetoaddress(node, VB_PERIOD - VB_BIP320_THRESHOLD - 1, node_deterministic_address)
|
||||
|
||||
self.log.info("Check that there is a warning if previous VB_BLOCKS have >=VB_THRESHOLD blocks with unknown versionbits version.")
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user